Steven Jarvis will lie to make his points. He does not care if they are easily debunked. He doesn’t care who he is lying to. Here he just openly lies to Jim Stewartson’s readers in the comment section because he either thinks they’re fucking idiots or knows they are.
Jarvis says a lot of stupid shit, and this is no different.
Here’s another time he says it.
Is anyone else sensing a pattern?
Does Jarvis really not understand synonyms or is he playing semantics? Legally, the difference isn’t important, so what’s his point?